Categories: links, linux, programming, python, snark, solaris, spam, sysadmin, tech, unix, web.
|
2009-04-30 My standard Gnome customizationsI don't use Gnome on my primary machine (it runs a peculiar, entirely custom environment), but I do use it on a number of secondary machines and I keep making more or less the same customizations each time. So I'm writing them down, if only for my own reference on the next machine.
Further laptop customizations:
I do not set laptops to dim the display when they go on to battery power; I can do that myself if I need to, and I otherwise want the screen to stay at whatever brightness I find most readable. Sidebar: my sshmenu dreamI find sshmenu reasonably handy, but as it is it has one little irritation; you have to add hosts to its menu. What I hoped for when I installed it was some sort of text widget that lived right in the top panel that you could type hostnames into and it would start ssh sessions to (in terminal windows). This is probably a dream peculiar to sysadmins, since I wind up ssh'ing
off to far too many machines to put into a menu structure. As it is I
just put the most common machines into sshmenu's menu, and fall back
to gnome-terminal and explicit (One comment.)
linux/GnomeCustomizations written at 22:07:36; Add Comment
Why I would still like MC/S in LinuxI recently ran across MC/S vs MPIO, which is about why iSCSI's 'multiple connections per session' feature is apparently considered a bad idea and is not likely to be implemented in Linux, the short summary being that it is an iSCSI specific duplication of generic multipathing functionality. Unfortunately, I sort of disagree with this in practice. In theory I don't care about how my multipathing is done, I just want something that makes general iSCSI multipathing work right. In practice, right now generic multipathing doesn't seem to be up to the job. The starting bad sign for me is that the Linux iSCSI target developers will generally give you reasonably scary warnings about using multipathing for anything but failover. There's specific reasons, but I think that they can be generalized to something simple: you have to trust the initiator to get all of this generic multipathing stuff right, and it may not. (And I know that there are some initiators that do not get it fully right, because we use one.) (Also, you have to trust the target to get all of the necessary supporting SCSI infrastructure correct, even the picky bits. It's possible that some targets are known to be incomplete there.) The great attraction of MC/S for me is that it is conceptually quite simple and does exactly and specifically what I want, partly because all sides know just what is going on. Full generic multipathing is much more indirect and complex, and its very generality means that it necessarily has more chances to go terribly wrong. (iSCSI being iSCSI, I'm entirely willing to believe that MC/S is actually a baroque pile of complexity once you read the actual specification. I haven't, so all I can go from is outside appearances.)
|
These are my WanderingThoughts GettingAround This is part of CSpace, and is written by ChrisSiebenmann. * * * Atom feeds are available; see the bottom of most pages. Categories: links, linux, programming, python, snark, solaris, spam, sysadmin, tech, unix, web |