Why Evolution is not my favorite mail readerI will admit up front that I am not an IMAP person; I'm an MH and exmh person and have been for years. The only reason I'm playing around with IMAP is that I'm more or less responsible for an IMAP server, so it behooves me to be able to test whether or not it's working. I picked Evolution as my IMAP test environment for various reasons including that it's the Gnome default. As a result of this, I have formed some opinions about why Evolution is not my favorite mail reader:
In fact, Evolution is silent pretty much any time something doesn't work, which makes it very frustrating whenever something goes wrong. Which it seems to for me with moderately distressing regularity. (For example, Evolution managed to get one IMAP folder into a state where it could half-see that there were messages there (sometimes), but totally refused to show me any of them. Fixing this was impossible, and eventually something just erased all of the messages.) I also have to say that it is annoying that no two IMAP clients seem to be able to agree about all of the fine details of how to deal with messages, which makes it hard to switch between clients for testing. Given that this is a client/server protocol to start with, it would be nice if the clients were more interoperable. In summary, I'm really glad that I'm just using Evolution and IMAP for testing and I don't have to use it as my real mail environment. (While bits of this have been accumulating for a while, this grump has been brought to you today by the process of trying to bring up a second IMAP server running different IMAP software on a different OS platform, and thus attempting to make sure that people can switch back and forth relatively transparently.) (2 comments.)
|
These are my WanderingThoughts GettingAround This is part of CSpace, and is written by ChrisSiebenmann. * * * Atom feeds are available; see the bottom of most pages. Categories: links, linux, programming, python, snark, solaris, spam, sysadmin, tech, unix, web |