Chris's Wiki :: blog/programming/SendingViaSMTPHarmful Commentshttps://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/programming/SendingViaSMTPHarmful?atomcommentsDWiki2011-03-25T09:01:27ZRecent comments in Chris's Wiki :: blog/programming/SendingViaSMTPHarmful.From 78.86.151.9 on /blog/programming/SendingViaSMTPHarmfultag:CSpace:blog/programming/SendingViaSMTPHarmful:62d350efbf8d891b756e84853ad5d3a0313df004From 78.86.151.9<div class="wikitext"><p>As a software developer, I would love to be able to assume that the machines my software will run on will be well configured. Unfortunately, that is not always the case, for various reasons.</p>
<p>-- David</p>
</div>2011-03-25T09:01:27ZFrom 76.10.173.95 on /blog/programming/SendingViaSMTPHarmfultag:CSpace:blog/programming/SendingViaSMTPHarmful:13f0388b4e0c0f284569ae1f5f1c2db5c381e7b1From 76.10.173.95<div class="wikitext"><p>Interesting. I suppose the java equivalent would be having an smtp library that you can hand an InputStream and OutputStream (the stdout and stdin of a child process) instead of a host/port. I think most java programmers would rather just have the local mailer listening on the loopback address though, at least based on what I've seen.</p>
<p>-Jeremy</p>
</div>2011-03-25T06:30:06Z