How to reject at SMTP time without enabling dictionary scanningOne claimed problem with rejecting unknown local addresses at SMTP
time is that it enables a spammer to do a cheap dictionary scan of
your domain to find valid usernames; all they have to do is try a
bunch of This doesn't completely block dictionary scanning (or other versions of address scanning), but it does force the spammer to do significantly more work. Their scanner now needs to be a multi-pass system that keeps a database, retries periodically, and so on. And it takes them longer to scan your domain (especially if you extend the overall greylisting time when mail sources try to hit a significant number of nonexistent users). If you want to make it more difficult (or can't do greylisting for whatever reason), only give your rejections after you see the message body. However, in this case you'll need to come up with some way of correctly handling messages to a mixture of good and bad local addresses. Sidebar: the mixed address problemThe problem comes up because your reply to the message body applies to all of the recipient addresses. If some of them are good but some of them are bad, there is no single reply that can be correct; both accepting and rejecting the message is lying about some destinations. You need to somehow contrive that you only accept recipient addresses of a single type, ideally without giving too much information away to a dictionary scanner. One obvious solution is to keep track of what sort of destination
addresses you've seen so far during the (You can accept all |
These are my WanderingThoughts GettingAround This is part of CSpace, and is written by ChrisSiebenmann. * * * Atom feeds are available; see the bottom of most pages. Categories: links, linux, programming, python, snark, solaris, spam, sysadmin, tech, unix, web |