Danger signs for mail senders in SMTP conversationsThis is another one of those entries that I write for people who are never going to read it, but I don't care; I just feel like pointing out the relatively obvious. Suppose that you are someone who runs a mailing list service. Like everyone else who offers such a service, spammers will attempt to (ab)use it. Thus, one of the important things that you need to do is detect signs that you have a spammer's mailing list, and these days you certainly can't count on abuse complaints to tell you this. As I've mentioned before, SMTP time rejections can be an important
signal. The corollary of this is that the kind
of SMTP rejection matters, and in particular you should really pay
attention to (And, let us admit, a disturbingly large number of mail systems have
temporary glitches that cause equally temporary Since they don't have these relatively innocent explanations, mail
rejections at (A significant volume of Of course, all of this presumes that you are trying hard to run a 'clean' mailing list service instead of any of the various alternatives. I'm not convinced that there is or can be any such thing these days, as convenient as it would be for modern web applications if there was. (One comment.)
|
These are my WanderingThoughts GettingAround This is part of CSpace, and is written by ChrisSiebenmann. * * * Atom feeds are available; see the bottom of most pages. Categories: links, linux, programming, python, snark, solaris, spam, sysadmin, tech, unix, web |