An ugly spam attempt
Every so often I take a look at what user agents are visiting
WanderingThoughts. Tonight it turned up a doozy; a single visit with a
The attack is also noteworthy for how brazen it is. The URL in the request is for 'buy4cheap.brinkster.net/buy2/side-search.htm', and the request itself came from 126.96.36.199, aka 'orf-premium12a.brinkster.com'. Most spammers are far less willing to clearly sign their work like that.
Spiders should respect
If you're writing a web spider, what should you do when you see a
In theory, you can do nothing different from any other link. It's not a formal specification, and the original description only talks about the resulting link not giving the target any credit.
In practice, on the Internet what people expect is in large
part defined by what the 800 pound gorillas do. And both Google
and MSN Search consider
nofollow to be literal: don't
follow this link. In fact Google explicitly documents this
behavior; see one of the original postings on
Google's description of it in their help pages.
So the real answer is: if you see a
rel="nofollow" link, you
shouldn't crawl the target.
Since Google (the original creators of
nofollow) describe it
this way, I will go so far as to say that respecting
requires you to not crawl marked links.
Spider authors should do this not just because it's what people expect, but because it's genuinely useful for guiding spiders around web sites. (Especially dynamic web sites like wikis and blogs, which can have a lot of different ways of viewing more or less the same content.)