Probably why Fedora puts their release version in package release numbers
Packaging schemes like RPM and Debian debs split full package names
up into three components: the name, the (upstream) version, and the
(distribution) release of the package. Back when people started
making RPM packages, the release component tended to be just a
number, giving you full names like
liferea-1.0.9-1 (this is
release 1 of Liferea 1.0.9). As I mentioned recently, the modern practice of Fedora release
numbers has changed to include the distribution version. Today we
liferea-1.10.13-1.fc21 instead (on Fedora 21, as you can
see). Looking at my Fedora systems, this appears to be basically
Before I started writing this entry and really thinking about the
problem, I thought there was a really good deep reason for this.
However, now I think it's so that if you're maintaining the same
version of a package on both Fedora 20 and Fedora 21, you can use
the exact same
.spec file. As an additional reason, it makes
automated rebuilds of packages for (and in) new Fedora versions
easier and work better for upgrades (in that someone upgrading
Fedora versions will wind up with the new version's packages).
The simple magic is in the
The RPM build process will substitute this in at build time with the
Fedora version you're building on (or for), giving you release numbers
like 1.fc20 and 1.fc21. Due to this substitution, any RPM
that does releases this way can be automatically rebuilt on a new Fedora
version without needing any
.spec file changes (and you'll still get a
new RPM version that will upgrade right, since RPM sees 1.fc21 as being
more recent than 1.fc20).
The problem that this doesn't really deal with (and I initially thought it did) is wanting to build an update to the Fedora 20 version of a RPM without updating the Fedora 21 version. If you just increment the release number of the Fedora 20 version, you get 2.fc20 and the old 1.fc21 and then upgrades won't work right (you'll keep the 2.fc20 version of the RPM). You'd have to change the F20 version to a release number of, say, '1.fc20.1'; RPM will consider this bigger than 1.fc20 but smaller than 1.fc21, so everything works out.
(I suspect that the current Fedora answer here is 'don't try to do just a F20 rebuild; do a pointless F21 rebuild too, just don't push it as an update'. Really there aren't many situations where you'd need to do a rebuild without any changes in the source package, and if you change the source package, eg to add a new patch, you probably want to do a F21 update too. I wave my hands.)
PS: I also originally thought that Ubuntu does this too, but no; while Ubuntu embeds 'ubuntu' in a lot of their package release numbers, it's not specific to the Ubuntu version involved and any number of packages don't have it. I assume it marks packages where Ubuntu deviates from the upstream Debian package in some way, eg included patches and so on.