The problem with Linux's 'predictable network interface names'
I find modern Linux auto-generated Ethernet device names to be a big pain, because they're such long jumbles. enp0s31f6? enp1s0f0? Please give me a break (and something short).
The fundamental problem with these 'predictable network interface
is that they aren't. By that I mean that if you tell me that a
system has, say, a motherboard 1G Ethernet port and a 10G-T Ethernet
port on a PCIE card, I can't predict what those interfaces will be
called unless I happen to have an exactly identical second machine
that I can check. If I want to configure the machine's networking
or ssh in to run a status check command on the 10G-T interface, I'm
pretty much out of luck; I'm going to have to run
some similar command to see what this machine has decided to call
(Yes, even for the motherboard network port, which may or may not
show up as
eno1 depending on the vagaries of life and your
specific configuration. The
from my tweet is such a port, and we have other machines where the
motherboard port is, eg,
The other problem with these names is that they're relatively long jumbles that are different from each other at various random positions (not just at the end). Names like this are hard to tell apart, hard to tell to people, and invite errors when you're working with them (because such errors won't stand out in the jumble). This might be tolerable if we were getting predictability in exchange for that jumble, but we aren't. If all we're going to get is stability, it would be nice to have names that are easier to deal with.
(We aren't even entirely getting stability, since PCI slot numbering isn't stable and that's what these names are based on.)
PS: There is a benefit to this naming scheme, which is that
identical hardware will have identical names and you can freely
transplant system disks (or system images) around between such
hardware. If I have a fleet of truly identical machines (down to
the PCIE cards being in the same physical slots), I know that
enp1s0f0 on one machine is
enp1s0f0 on every machine.
(Over the years, these device names have been implemented with somewhat different names by a number of different Linux components (eg). These days they come from udev, which is now developed as part of systemd in case you wish to throw the usual stones. I'm not sure if udev considers the specific naming scheme to be stable, considering the official documentation points you to the source code.)
Sidebar: What this scheme does give us
Given identical and unchanging hardware (and BIOS), we get names that are consistent from boot to boot, from machine to machine, and are 'stateless' in that they don't depend on the past history of the Linux install running on the machine (your five year old install that's been been moved between three machines sees the same names as a from-scratch install made yesterday).
Comments on this page:Written on 29 March 2018.