== Systemd and waiting until network interfaces or addresses are configured One of the things that systemd is very down on is the idea of running services after 'the network is up', whatever that means; the systemd people have [[an entire web page on the subject https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/NetworkTarget]]. This is all well and good in theory, but in practice there are plenty of situations where I need to only start certain things after either a named network interface is present or an IP address exists. For a concrete example, you can't set up various pieces of [[policy based routing DualIdentityRouting]] for an interface until the interface actually exists. If you're configuring this on boot in a systemd based system (especially one using [[networkd SystemdNetworkdSetup]]), you need some way to insure the ordering. Similarly, sometimes you need to listen only on some specific IP addresses and the software you're using doesn't have Linux specific hacks to do that when the IP address doesn't exist yet. (As a grumpy sysadmin, I actually don't like the behavior of binding to an IP address that doesn't exist, because it means that daemons will start and run even if the system will never have the IP address. I would much rather delay daemon startup until the IP address exists.) Systemd does not have direct native support for any of this, of course. There's no way to directly say that you depend on an interface or an IP address, and [[in general the dependency structure has long been under-documented SystemdDependencyProblem]]. The closest you can get to waiting until a named network interface exists is to specify an After= and perhaps a Want= or a Requires= on the pseudo-unit for the network interface, 'sys-subsystem-net-devices-.device'. However, as I found out, [[the lack of a .device unit doesn't always mean that the interface doesn't exist https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741678]]. You might think that in order to wait for an IP address to exist, you could specify an After= for the .device unit it's created in and by. However, this has historically had issues for me; under at least some versions of systemd, the .device unit would be created before the IP address was configured. In my particular situation, what worked at the time was to wait for a VLAN interface .device that was on top of the real interface that had the IP address (and yes, [[I mix tagged VLANs with an untagged network UntaggedAndTaggedInterface]]). By the time the VLAN .device existed, the IP address had relatively reliably been set up. If you're using systemd-networkd and care about network interfaces, the easiest approach is probably to rely on [[systemd-networkd-wait-online.service https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-networkd-wait-online.service.html]]; how it works and what it waits for is probably about as good as you can get. For IP addresses, as far as I know there's no native thing that specifically waits until some or all of your static IP addresses are present. Waiting for systemd-networkd-wait-online is probably going to be good enough for most circumstances, but if I needed better I would probably write a shell script (and a .service unit for it) that simply waited until the IP addresses I needed were present. (I continue to think that it's a real pity that you can't configure networkd .network files to have 'network up' and 'network down' scripts, especially since their stuff for routing and policy based routing is really very verbose.) PS: One of the unfortunate effects of [[the under-documented dependency structure and the lack of clarity of what to wait on SystemdDependencyProblem]] is a certain amount of what I will call 'superstitious dependencies', things that you've put into your systemd units without fully understanding whether or not you needed them, and why (often also [[without fully documenting them DocumentStartupDependencies]]). This is fine most of the time, but then [[one day https://twitter.com/thatcks/status/1162073793671651328]] an unnecessary dependency fails to start or perhaps exist and then you're unhappy. That's part of why I would like explicit and reliable ways to do all of this.