Using a single git repo to compare things between two upstreams
The other day I wrote about hand-building an updated upstream
kernel module. One of the things
that I wanted to do in that is to compare the code of the nct6775
module I wanted to build between the 4.20.x branch in the stable
tree
and the hwmon-next branch in Guenter Roeck's tree.
In my entry, I did this by cloning each Git repo separately and
then running diff
by hand, but this is a little awkward and I
said that there was probably a way to do this in a single Git repo.
Today I have worked out how to do that, and so I'm going to write
it down.
To do this we need a single Git repo with both trees present in it, which means that both upstream repos need to be remotes. We can set up one as a remote simply by cloning from it:
git clone [...]/groeck/linux-staging.git
(I've chosen to start with the repo I'm theoretically going to be building from, instead of the repo I'm only using to diff against.)
Then we need to add the second repo as a remote, and fetch it:
cd linux-staging git remote add stable [...]/stable/linux.git git fetch stable
At this point 'git branch -r
' will show us that we have all of
the branches from both sides. With the data from both upstreams
in our local repo and a full set of branches, we can do the full
form of the diff:
git diff stable/linux-4.20.y..origin/hwmon-next drivers/hwmon/nct6775.c
We can make this more convenient by shortening one or both names, like so:
git checkout linux-4.20.y git checkout hwmon-next git diff linux-4.20.y.. drivers/hwmon/nct6775.c
I'm using 'git checkout
' here partly as a convenient way to run
'git branch
' with the right magic set of options:
git branch --track linux-4.20.y stable/linux-4.20.y
Actually checking out hwmon-next
means we don't have to name it
explicitly.
We can also diff against tags from the stable repo, and we get to do it without needing to say which upstream the tags are from:
git diff v4.20.6.. drivers/hwmon/nct6775.c git diff v4.19.15.. drivers/hwmon/nct6775.c
The one drawback I know of to a multi-headed repo like this is that I'm not sure how you get rid of an upstream that you don't want any more. At one level you can just delete the remote, but that leaves various things cluttering up your repo, including both branches and tags. Presumably there is a way in Git to clean those up and then let Git's garbage collection eventually delete the actual Git objects involved and reclaim the storage.
(One can do more involved magic by not configuring the second repo
as a remote and using 'git fetch
' directly with its URL, but I'm
not sure how to make the branch handling work nicely and so on.
Setting it up as a full remote makes all of that work, although it
also pulls in all tags unless you use '--no-tags
' and understand
what you're doing here, which I don't.)
Looking back, all of this is relatively basic and straightforward and I think I knew most of the individual bits and pieces involved. But I'm not yet familiar and experienced enough with git to confidently put them all together on the fly when my real focus is doing something else.
(Git is one of those things that I feel I should be more familiar with than I actually am, so every so often I take a run at learning how to do another thing in it.)
|
|