Chris's Wiki :: blog/solaris/ZFSOracleFuture Commentshttps://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/solaris/ZFSOracleFuture?atomcommentsDWiki2012-08-06T03:02:26ZRecent comments in Chris's Wiki :: blog/solaris/ZFSOracleFuture.By Chris Siebenmann on /blog/solaris/ZFSOracleFuturetag:CSpace:blog/solaris/ZFSOracleFuture:a26786af3167dd8fb1fc0a85491a9fab744701b8Chris Siebenmann<div class="wikitext"><p>The short version is that I think Solaris is (or was) significantly
less attractive than some people generally feel it is. I wrote about
the general factors in action in <a href="https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/tech/OSAttraction">OSAttraction</a>.</p>
</div>2012-08-06T03:02:26ZFrom 194.168.32.194 on /blog/solaris/ZFSOracleFuturetag:CSpace:blog/solaris/ZFSOracleFuture:d3c0e71010f7f50c59edbd86d82ce22e0e8dc632From 194.168.32.194<div class="wikitext"><p>Much as it pains me that this is the case, I tend to agree that if ZFS wasn't appealing enough already, it is hard to think of anything extra that would help. The feature set of Solaris 10, which I thought was quite outstanding from an OS point of view at the time, never seemed to gain much traction with decision-makers (possibly because they tend not to have an "OS point of view").</p>
</div>2012-08-02T08:41:36Z