Chris's Wiki :: blog/spam/NullSenderBenefitsTheories Commentshttps://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/spam/NullSenderBenefitsTheories?atomcommentsDWiki2015-10-28T01:34:45ZRecent comments in Chris's Wiki :: blog/spam/NullSenderBenefitsTheories.By DrScriptt on /blog/spam/NullSenderBenefitsTheoriestag:CSpace:blog/spam/NullSenderBenefitsTheories:8a971bf59ede32a0ca66187215342abfca4e3f02DrScriptthttp://dotfiles.tnetconsulting.net/<div class="wikitext"><p>I suspect that the Null Reverse Path "<>" is more used to reduce the Joe Jobing effect.</p>
<p>It's my experience that people only REALLY complain when they are being Joe Jobed. Otherwise, people will just send messages to the Spam / Trash folder.</p>
<p>Ultimately, using the NRP is trivial, and it probably has a measurable effect on sending statistics. So ... why not?</p>
<p>Further, it does complicate MTA level black listing / RBL processing of the SMTP Mail From address. So they probably get past simple / naive filters.</p>
</div>2015-10-28T01:34:45Z