How not to set up your DNS (part 6)
Today's illustrative example is about the odd things that can happen if you rename a nameserver without making sure that you tell the people delegating zones to you.
There are four nameservers for
utoronto.ca: ns1, ns2, bay.cs, and
ns1.tpc.int (following local practice, I'm dropping the
bit a lot). Three of those four (everything except ns1) are also
secondaries for all campus subdomains, including the domain
; sdig ns jpint.utoronto.ca. ns1.jpint.utoronto.ca. bay.cs.utoronto.ca. ns2.utoronto.ca. ns1.tpc.int. ; sdig a ns1.jpint.utoronto.ca. 18.104.22.168
There is also another machine,
mto.jpint. Most of the time, if I asked
for its IP address I got 22.214.171.124. Except once or twice, I didn't;
I got 126.96.36.199, ns1.jpint's IP address.
Unfortunately, this nice proper set of NS records was a lie. The lie was
exposed by asking ns1.utoronto.ca for NS information for
jpint; it was
of the opinion that the right nameserver was
mto.jpint, to be found
at the IP address 188.8.131.52.
What had happened is that
jpint had renamed their primary nameserver;
what had been 'mto.jpint' became 'ns1.jpint', and the 'mto.jpint' name
was given a new IP address. But no one told the campus nameserver people
about this, so the
utoronto.ca zone carried the old NS data, with the
old glue record for
mto.jpint with its old IP address.
As secondaries, three out of four of the
utoronto.ca nameservers then
jpint zone from 184.108.40.206, and replaced their own idea
jpint NS records and
mto.jpint's IP address with the zone's
information. Because it is not a campus secondary,
not, preserving the original info to be handed out when queried.
As you can see, this is really quite hard to notice; the only
real sign was the 'blue moon' wrong IP address for
I only really chased this down when I ran the domain through the
dnsreport.com DNS consistency checker and
ns1.utoronto.ca to pull DNS information from, leading me to
wonder just why
ns1.jpint was being reported as a 'stealth NS record'.
This isn't a new problem; similar issues (but worse) used to happen in the old InterNIC days. (An explanation of those problems does not fit in the margin of this entry.)
(The jpint situation is in the process of being fixed, so hopefully soon you won't be able to see this for yourself.)