== A limitation of _tcpdump_ is that you can't tell in from out Suppose that you are running _tcpdump_ on [[a network that's experiencing problems NetworkLoopsAreWeird]], on a machine which you know is supposed to be sending out broadcast ARP requests. When you do something that provokes an ARP request, you see two or three ARP broadcast packets from the machine in close succession (but not back to back; timestamps say there's a little bit of time between each). That sounds okay, doesn't it? Or at least it's not too crazy. There's a plausible case for rapid repeated ARPs in cases where the first request didn't get an immediate reply, and probably Unixes behave differently here so experience on say Linux doesn't necessarily tell you what to normally expect on OpenBSD or Illumos. Except that there's a problem here. As far as I know, there is no way to tell from _tcpdump_ output whether you're seeing these packets because the system is transmitting them or because it's receiving them. Of course normally you shouldn't (re-)receive packets that your system initially transmitted, but, well, [[network loops can happen NetworkLoopsAreWeird]]. Some versions of _tcpdump_ have a switch to control whether it listens to input packets, output packets, or both. On OpenBSD this is _-D_, on different versions of Linux it is either _-P_ (Ubuntu, CentOS) or _-Q_ (Fedora); FreeBSD doesn't seem to have an option for this. Of course to use this option (if it's available) you have to remember that some sort of echo-back situation might be happening, but at least you can check for it. This is definitely something that I'm going to have to try to remember for future network troubleshooting. Sadly it's not as simple as always using 'in' initially, because often you want to see both what the machine is sending and what it's getting back; you just would like to be able to tell them apart immediately. (I believe that this is a limitation of the underlying kernel interfaces that tcpdump uses, in that most or all implementations simply don't tag packets with whether they're 'out' or 'in' packets.) (This is just one of a number of ways that I've found to be misled by not looking sufficiently closely at what tcpdump seems to be telling me. Eg [[_tcpdump -p_ versus not VLANAndMACSurprise]], [[various firewall and IPSec settings causing received packets to be dropped ../linux/IKEShuttingDownConnection]] or even [[IPSec re-materializing packets ../linux/IptablesBlockNonIpsec]], and [[not looking at MAC addresses CheckPacketEthernetAddress]] ([[also IPRealization]]).)