== A caching and zone refresh problem with Unbound Like many people, we have internal resolving DNS servers that everyone's laptops and so on are supposed to use for their DNS. These used to run Bind and now run Unbound, mostly because OpenBSD switched which nameservers they like. Also like many people, we have a collection of internal zones and internal zone views, which are managed from a private internal master DNS server. This has led to a problem with our Unbound setup that we actually don't know how to solve. When we make an update to internal DNS and reload the private master with it, we want this to be reflected on the resolving DNS servers essentially immediately so that people see the DNS change right away. In the days when we ran Bind on the resolving servers, this was easy; we configured the resolving Bind to be a secondary for our internal zones and set the master up with _also-notify_ entries for it. When the master detected a zone change, it sent notifications out and the resolving Bind immediately loaded the new data. Done. It's not clear how to achieve something like this with Unbound. Unbound doesn't listen to _NOTIFY_ messages and do anything with them (although it's listed as a TODO item in the source code). While you can force an incredibly low TTL on DNS records so that the new DNS information will be seen within a minute or two, this setting is global; you can't apply it to just some zones, like say your own, and leave everything else cached as normal. In theory we could set absurdly low TTLs on everything in the internal views on the private master, which would propagate through to Unbound. In practice, how the internal views are build makes this infeasible; it would be a major change in what is a delicate tangle of a complex system. (With low TTLs there's also the issue of cached negative entries, since we're often adding names that didn't exist before but may have been looked up to see that nope, there is no such hostname.) Unbound can be told to flush specific zones via _unbound-control_ and in theory this works remotely (if you configure it explicitly, among other things). In practice I have a number of qualms about this approach, even if it's scripted, and Unbound's documentation explicitly says that flushing zones is a slow operation. Given that Unbound explicitly doesn't support _NOTIFY_ yet, there's probably no real good solution to this. That's sometimes how it goes. (We have what I'm going to call a workaround that we currently feel we can live with, but I'm not going to tell you what it is because it's not really an appealing one.)