Reddit versus Digg: a little detail that matters

December 15, 2005

Since and started showing up on the geek radar, I've been checking them out. Since both are about the same thing, roughly a 'just the links' version of Slashdot's 'news for nerds' approach, I expected to like them about equally, or like more, since it has link summaries (which are often the most useful bit of Slashdot for me).

To my surprise, I've been barely visiting, but have found myself dropping by frequently; it just felt nicer to use. It's taken me some time to realize why, and it turns out to have come down to one little difference in their website design.

The difference: on, I can see what links I've already read; on, I can't, because has decided to have unvisited links and visited links be the same colour.

The little extra work of thinking about whether I'd already read an interesting looking link turned out to be enough of a turnoff that I quietly tuned out. On, my browser does the remembering, and my eyes automatically skip over the darker links. No fuss, no muss, continued reading.

Digg also pushes me away with a small font size for the link summary text, the thing I am most interested in reading, forcing me to enlarge it in Firefox in order to read it comfortably. (I've written about this before, and it's even Jakob Nielsen's leading design mistake of 2005.)

Update: and shame on me for not noticing that not differentiating visited and unvisited links is part of Jakob Nielsen's number two design mistake of 2005. And he discusses it in more detail in an older Alertbox here.

Written on 15 December 2005.
« A thing I don't like about Linux
Another introspection trick »

Page tools: View Source, Add Comment.
Login: Password:
Atom Syndication: Recent Comments.

Last modified: Thu Dec 15 01:13:10 2005
This dinky wiki is brought to you by the Insane Hackers Guild, Python sub-branch.