How ETags and If-Modified-Since headers interact
Part of the fun of writing programs that deal with HTTP is decoding things like RFC 2616 to answer somewhat obscure questions about how various things interact. Today's case is the following question:
When can your web server generate a 304 'content not modified' response if it receives a request with both an
If-None-Match
and anIf-Modified-Since
header?
If-None-Match
and If-Modified-Since
are HTTP request headers used
to implement 'conditional GET', a bandwidth saving technique that
avoids re-fetching unchanged pages (see
here
or here for
more discussion of this).
(ETag
headers come into this because the server's ETag
value is
what the client will use as its If-None-Match
value in the
conditional GET request.)
The answer turns out to be in section 13.3.4 of RFC 2616. It is (de-RFC-ized):
You can only generate a 304 response if both headers match; the
If-None-Match
matches the response'sETag
and theIf-Modified-Since
header matches theLast-Modified
.
In the case of If-Modified-Since
and Last-Modified
, servers may
require an exact match instead of merely Last-Modified being no later
than If-Modified-Since. As RFC 2616 notes in
14.25,
client authors should really just store the Last-Modified result as a
string and hork it up in their If-Modified-Since header.
This came up when I threw debugging code into DWiki to see exactly what various people repeatedly pulling my Atom feed without getting bandwidth-efficient 304 responses were sending. One feed reader was sending both headers but making up their own If-Modified-Since instead of just repeating Last-Modified. (DWiki requires an exact match for technical reasons.)
(Whether by accident or by reading RFC 2616 carefully when I wrote the code and then forgetting it, DWiki does the right thing when both headers are present.)
|
|